Today marks the final day of the North Dakota Legislature’s Interim Higher Education Committee two-day meeting at UND. The UND SMHS was proud to host the event, especially since almost a dozen of us (along with Dave Molmen, the CEO of Altru Health System and chair of the School’s Advisory Council) met with the Committee (as I outlined in last week’s E-News). You can find the slide deck that accompanied the various UND SMHS presentations here.
The Committee devoted an hour of Thursday morning’s agenda to a report on the School’s research enterprise. So why would the Interim Higher Education Committee ask about our research effort? Isn’t its focus on our educational mission? Yes, of course the focus was educational. The bulk of the morning’s agenda dealt primarily with a discussion of our primary mission in education and healthcare workforce preparation. But the School is also tasked by the Legislature with the “discovery of knowledge that benefits the people of this state and enhances the quality of their lives” as specified in the state’s Century Code (Section 15-52-01), the codified laws of North Dakota.
So how does one assess the growth and success of a research program? Clearly, the ultimate arbiter is how discoveries in the laboratory positively affect people. But the time lag between the two often is long, and the effect difficult to quantify. So one surrogate measure that typically is used around the country to evaluate research productivity is to calculate how many research dollars flow into a given institution, since research grants typically are competitive and being awarded a grant means that a group of scientist judges thought that your grant was better than the other submitted grants. Thus, so-called sponsored funding is probably the most commonly used measure of research productivity around, for better or worse.
Slide No. 63 from the presentation summarizes the School’s sponsored (research) funding over the past two decades.
This slide shows in green the total research funding (sponsored funding) awarded to the School since 1996 (the curve is a three-year rolling average to smooth the ups and downs of the raw data). The two red circles show two periods of substantial growth in funding: one from about 1999 through 2004, and the other from 2009 until the present. What is interesting is the superimposed funding in purple that shows the relative amount of total appropriations the National Institutes of Health (NIH) received over the same period (NIH funding has been divided by 1,000 so it fits on the slide). Since over 80 percent of the sponsored funding that the School receives comes from federal sources (especially the NIH), a comparison with NIH appropriations over the years is quite appropriate. Note that the growth of UND SMHS funding in the earlier period (left circle) closely mirrors and follows the growth in available NIH funding, indicating that the School competed effectively as new federal dollars became available. But what is perhaps even more interesting is what has been happening recently, when NIH funding has been essentially flat (at least up until this year). Note that despite the relative flatness of the NIH curve, UND SMHS funding has increased. In fact, since 2009 it has increased nearly 50 percent, or about 7 percent per year. And this is during a time when competition for funding has become more intense, at least in part because of flat funding and more researchers looking for funding. After all, the size of medical school classes nationwide has increased by almost a third in the past decade, and presumably the faculty ranks have grown commensurately. Thus, we’ve done exceedingly well in a period of intensified competition. So congratulations are in order for the School’s researchers, not just for competing exceedingly well for federal dollars, but more importantly, for working hard every day to fulfill our mission to discover “knowledge that benefits the people of this state and enhances the quality of their lives.”
Joshua Wynne, MD, MBA, MPH
Recent Educational Policies to Review
Standards of Capacity (for medical students)
View all of the School's Policies and Procedures.
[ Back To Top ]
Robin Besse began employment as a research analyst in the Center for Rural Health on August 15. Her supervisor is Mandi Peterson.
Rural Health Policy Specialist
Conner Corbett began employment as a rural health policy specialist in the Center for Rural Health on August 15. His supervisor is Naomi Lelm.
Program Coordinator/Student Services Officer
Ardith Marsette began employment as a program coordinator/student services officer in INMED on August 8. Her supervisor is Eugene DeLorme.
Mihir Shetty began employment as a laboratory technician in the Department of Biomedical Sciences on August 16. His supervisor is Lucia Carvelli.
[ Back To Top ]
Social Media—Dr. Timothy Henry named as a Sioux Award winner
On our Facebook page, Dr. Timothy Henry, BS Med '82, has been named a Sioux Award winner. He will receive his award at UND Homecoming in October.
Also on our Facebook page, Dean Wynne answers questions about stress tests and about cellulitis in his latest Health Matters column, which can be found in the Grand Forks Herald every other Monday. Please submit any general health-related questions to email@example.com.
You can also get the latest SMHS news by following the School on Twitter.
University Letter—Borboa-Peterson named director of Multicultural Programs and Services
Stacey Borboa-Peterson has been named director of Multicultural Programs & Services at the University of North Dakota. She has been serving as the interim in this position since February 2016 after former director Malika Carter left UND. Borboa-Peterson officially began as director on Aug. 16.
More information about this and other UND news can be found in the University Letter. Published on Tuesdays and Thursdays, it is distributed electronically to the University community and is always available online. For more information, contact editor Jan Orvik at (701) 777-3621.
"Strategies to Prevent Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome"—CDC Grand Rounds
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Public Health Grand Rounds is a monthly webcast created to foster discussion on major public health issues. Each session focuses on key challenges related to a specific health topic, and explores the latest scientific evidence and the potential effect of different interventions. The Grand Rounds sessions also highlight how the CDC and its partners are already addressing these challenges and discuss the recommendations for future research and practice. August's presentation is "Primary Prevention and Public Health Strategies to Prevent Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome." All of the webcasts are archived for later viewing.
[ Back To Top ]
USDA GF Human Nutrition Research Center seeks study participants
The United States Department of Agriculture Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center is seeking participants for two research studies.
For more information, and to see if you qualify, check out our website, or contact Vanessa Thyne, Biological Laboratory Technician, Dietary Prevention of Disease Research Unit, Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center, (701) 795-8493.
Flow Cytometry publication support
The ND Flow Cytometry Cell Sorting Core Facility (ND-FCCS) was developed to support the research efforts of all faculty in North Dakota. The ND-FCCS is supported through the coordinated efforts of the North Dakota IDeA (Institutional Development Award) Network of Biomedical Research Excellence (ND INBRE): Health and the Environment, the Center of Biomedical Research Excellence (COBRE) in Host-Pathogen Interactions, and the dean of the School of Medicine and Health Sciences. This support has allowed the facility to remain free-of-charge and staffed with full-time technical assistance for all researchers. The only charge to investigators is the need to provide supply items specific to their research. In order for the facility to remain “charge-free,” it is imperative that the two IDeA programs are acknowledged for their support on scholarly products that utilized the ND-FCCS. This information is required by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) on both noncompetitive and competitive renewals of the programs.
“The research reported in this [publication, release] was supported by Institutional Development Awards (IDeA) from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under grant number P20GM103442 and P20GM113123.”
The ND INBRE will provide $1,000 toward publication costs of manuscripts that acknowledge both the above IDEA programs between July 1, 2016, and April 30, 2017. The ND INBRE will also provide $1,000 toward publication costs of any manuscripts that have acknowledged ND INBRE support from January 1, 2016, to June 30, 2016.
Don Sens, PhD, Principal Investigator, ND INBRE
UND Neuroscience COBRE Pilot Grant Program for high-risk, high-reward projects
In this the final year of our neuroscience COBRE grant that has been funded continuously over the past 15 years, we are inviting investigators from the UND School of Medicine and Health Sciences to submit neuroscience proposals for high-risk, high-reward science or commercialization projects. The goal of this year’s pilot grant program is for people to, for example, buy or develop new reagents, obtain or create new animal models, and/or conduct risky experiments that would be hard to fund otherwise.
For science-based projects, this is an opportunity for investigators to generate some truly exciting new data capable of convincing study section reviewers to recommend the funding of new grant submissions.
For commercialization-based projects, this is an opportunity for investigators to become first-time inventors, to develop intellectual property, to make invention disclosures based on research findings, to file patent applications, to establish R&D partnerships with industry partners based on disclosed technologies, to develop prototypes, to license patent rights for commercialization of products, and/or to attract additional funding sources to enhance the scope of the work.
As mandated by the NIH-funded COBRE grant program, the proposals must be reviewed and evaluated by the neuroscience COBRE grant’s External Advisory Board members.
Proposals will be evaluated based on the following criteria:
Eligibility: Pilot grants may be submitted either by a single PI or by co-PIs. Co-PI projects must clearly state the shared nature of responsibilities among the co-PIs. The PIs must have full-time faculty appointments in the UND School of Medicine and Health Sciences.
Availability of Funds: No more than $200K is available in the current grant year (2016–2017) to support this program. A maximum of $40K will be awarded to any one project. All awarded funds must be spent by Friday, May 19, 2017. A detailed budget must be included. The pilot grant funding mechanism will not support faculty salaries or F&A. Equipment purchases will not be allowed.
APPLICATION FOR PILOT PROJECT PROPOSAL:
The following components must not exceed two pages total (excluding the face page, budget and budget justification, resources format page, biosketches, as well as IRB and IACUC approvals).
a. Project Summary
Budget Summary and Budget Justification:
IRB and IACUC Approval:
[ Back To Top ]
Health Sciences Library closed Sunday, August 21
Because of unforeseen circumstances, the Library will be closed this Sunday, August 21.
Regular hours will resume on Monday.
Health Sciences Library hours.
If you have any questions, please contact Kelly Thormodson (701) 777-4129.
[ Back To Top ]